But that doesn't mean the show we have now can't still be a lot of fun.

That's actually commendable in and of itself, but it's possible that the show won't ever be able to reclaim all of the elements that made it work so well initially. It didn't completely recapture the greatness of its first season, but perhaps it never will - Season 1 not only offered something fresh and new, it also had a very strong season long story arc that was completely resolved by the end of the year. Desperate Housewives was much better in its third year than its second, bouncing back with far more engaging and interesting plots and recapturing much of the witty comedic moments - some decidedly wacky, some incredibly dark - that makes it a soap opera with something outside the ordinary to it. To his credit though, Housewives creator and executive producer Marc Cherry acknowledged these problems to the press, and set about to make Season 3 something much more on par with the first year.ДЄnd he succeeded! Well, somewhat. Season 2 of the show was a distinct downturn for the series, with the effortlessly clever and involving storylines from Season 1 giving way to much more bogged down and meandering new material. How do you live up to the hype that first year caused? It was a problem Desperate Housewives had to face in its second season, and unfortunately it wasn't an example of being able to successfully deliver. You're a hit in every way, people are all talking about the show, and thenвЂ¦ Season 2. You come out of the gate super strong, with a show not only the critics but a mainstream audience readily embraces. It's a common problem successful shows face.

Desperate housewives game digital